Then ultimately the end result could lead to a retrial. Funds appropriated for capital punishment can have more of a positive impact when allocated to homicide prevention, education, and programs for the families of the victims. There is no cost-benefit analysis that indicates that capital punishment is diminishing the homicide rates in this country.
The death penalty only gives a false sense of security to the general public, despite being allowed by the U. There is a misconception among proponents of capital punishment that the death penalty makes would be murderers more apprehensive to committing these criminal acts. There are validated studies that prove states without the death penalty have lower murder rates than states with the death penalty. Evidently, the death penalty is an ineffective policy in homicide reduction. Can there be equal justice for a person who kills another?
Supporters of abolishing the death penalty do not have misplaced sympathy for murderers. The ideology of completely abolishing the death penalty nationwide is support for a civilization that upholds the value of human rights.
Putting a murderer to death will not bring the victim back to life and will only bring temporary pain relief to the families of the victim. This blog post is provided free of charge and we encourage you to use it for your research and writing. However, we do require that you cite it properly using the citation provided below in MLA format. Ultius Blog, 15 Mar. Click here for more help with MLA citations.
Research Paper on the Death Penalty. Click here for more help with APA citations. Click here for more help with CMS citations. Click here for more help with Turabian citations. Ultius is the trusted provider of content solutions and matches customers with highly qualified writers for sample writing, academic editing, and business writing. Ultius is the trusted provider of content solutions for consumers around the world. Go to Homepage current My Account my. Core offerings Browse by service type Start your search By selecting a service type.
Even with fairly relaxed law enforcement after , between two thousand and three thousand persons were sentenced to death each year from to Isenberg Furthermore, several decisions, later on in history, handed down by the Supreme Court in the post-World War II years have had a significant affect on the effects of both proponents and opponents of capital punishment.
They include Louisiana v. Resweber - cruelty dealing with humane ways of execution, next was the United States v. Jackson - the provisions that dealt with kidnapping, next was Witherspoon v. Illinois - determined excluding juries that had a bias towards death penalties being unconstitutional, and finally McGautha v. All of these have impacted the nature of the death penalty, as we all know it today in the United States.
These have all influenced the way people view the death penalty and help explain why some people oppose it and some impose it.
The people who oppose the death penalty have very different reasons than people who agree with it. Those who oppose it feel that no matter how bad of an offense that the criminal has committed, they should not be executed. One argument is that the convicted could be innocent. Once the state kills an innocent person, the effects are irreversible. There have been at least 96 instances since of wrongfully convicted people set free before the states had a chance to kill them Internet.
DNA evidence has come a long way to help these innocent people to their freedom. The following person is an example of one of those people wrongfully condemned by lack of evidence. In May , Nate was sentenced to life in prison for a Elizabeth, N.
A twelve-year-old semen specimen was located and analyzed. It proved that Nate had a different blood type from the real rapist. His release won national attention Dicks This is among one of the highest regards to the abolitionist movement towards the death penalty. Thousands have been put to death under one government and when another government came in, or new evidence came in, they were proven to be innocent Dicks The only way to prevent this from happening is to abolish the death penalty altogether.
These wrongful convictions clearly occurred due to some ill proper investigating, prejudice, courtroom laziness, or politics. The discrimination that is inescapable in the selection of the few to be killed under our capital punishment laws is unfortunately of the most irreversible and unacceptable nature Isenberg Among the more high-powered nations in the world the United States remains the leading advocate of death as a punishment for crime, even though innocent people may have been put to death Isenberg The abolitionists also assert that the deterrent theory does not actually work.
It merely produces a brutalizing effect that says to others that killing is o. Since the state has the right to kill, having the death penalty reinforces the perpetrator in that it says it is o. To even approach the number of people to be sentenced to death, to reach the deterrent effect, is unimaginable.
Hundreds of thousands, in my opinion, would have to be put to death to reach the deterrent goal. So those juries that are commanded to use the death penalty have often acquitted, due to beliefs, or charged the perpetrator with a lesser offense Isenberg Even though hundreds of thousands go to trial for murder, juries are reluctant to convict. So our system clearly does not even give room for the deterrent effect, which would be hundreds of thousands put to death, to affect the way perpetrators would think before killing.
States in the United States that do not use the death penalty usually have lower murder rates than states that do Internet. For example, between and , the average murder rate among seven abolitionist states ranged from a high of 1. A closer look shows that murder rates play a contributing role in death penalty arguments across the United States Galliher An example is, between and , the states of West Virginia not yet an abolitionist state and Michigan had relatively higher murder rates of 5.
Therefore, reinforcing the fact that the brutalization effect is right. Maybe since we are in the television revolution, we should televise it more than the little it is today. There are those that are pro-death penalty advocates. They believe that the death penalty serves as a deterrent. They believe others will see that the offender is getting executed for their heinous crime, and this will deter them from ever committing such an act.
They feel that not only is the person who is executed unable to commit another murder, but other potential killers may also be dissuaded from killing Silverman One scientist concluded that every additional execution prevents about seven or eight people from committing murder Bender It mainly deters rational calm everyday citizens. Not those who act on emotion or the heat of the moment. One could argue that there are far more rational civilized people in this country than there are emotionally disturbed people.
The death penalty works because it instills psychological resistance to the act of murder, not because it offers a rational argument against committing the act at the time that the decision to murder is made Bender So every day citizens have instilled into their heads that it is bad to murder someone.
But murders still occur on occasions when people are in an irrational state of mind. Even though a person may be rational one day they could become irrational on another day. The irrational people are mainly at the hands of alcohol and drugs, but there are occasions where unusual circumstances exist.
For example, a husband catching his wife in the act of adultery could drive him mentally into a rage and into a very irrational state of mind, which could ultimately lead to murder. But there are also those people who are just straight up mentally disturbed that kill for no reason at all.
More recently, as we become more civilized, the death penalty has been questioned to be the right step towards justice. During the course of this paper I will review the pros and cons of the use of the death penalty as we, Americans, know it. The death penalty is a highly controversial subject.
One of the most popular topics for an argument essay is the death penalty. When researching a topic for an argumentative essay, accuracy is important, which means the quality of your sources is important.
Research Paper On Death Penalty Death penalty is also known as capital punishment or execution. Societies from all over the world have used this sentence at . Research Papers words ( pages) Essay on Politics and The Death Penalty - The question regarding whether the United States should implement the death penalty as a form of punishment is a heated issue in American politics.
Research Paper on the Death Penalty The death penalty is a capital punishment that is put into effect for major crimes. The death penalty is a very controversial topic in the United States and throughout the world. There was a time period were the death penalty was banned for about four years in Death Penalty Research Paper Posted on November 22, by EssayShark The death penalty, also known as capital punishment is a legal process through which an individual is sentenced to death by the state justice as punishment for a crime committed (Dieter, ).